Test Workflows

Validate RiskOS™ workflows using historical evaluations or custom JSON payloads to catch issues before deploying to production.


When to use workflow testing

  • Validate against historical data before deployment.
  • Analyze hypothetical outcomes retroactively.
  • Simulate edge cases by running tests with custom JSON payloads.
  • Run regression checks after making workflow changes.
  • Experiment safely in a controlled environment.
📘

Note:

Workflow testing is currently disabled for workflows that include any asynchronous steps (e.g., DocV, OTP, Wait step) or asynchronous data services (e.g., Middesk, Thomson Reuters).

This is a temporary limitation we plan to lift in Q4 2025. If you need to test such workflows today, we can provide synchronous drop-in replacements. Please work with your Solutions Consultant or email [email protected] for details.


Testing modes

RiskOS™ supports two types of testing:

  • Historical evaluations: Previously processed records are re-executed against the workflow.

    • No live decisions or cases are created.
    • Results are available for analytical comparison.
  • Custom JSON payloads: Input a single JSON object to simulate a scenario.

    • Ideal for debugging or validating behavior with synthetic data.
    • Results are immediate but lightweight — there is no persistent storage and responses cannot be opened in Case Management.

1. Run a workflow test

  1. Save your workflow draft.
  2. Click Run a backtest in the Workflow Canvas.
  3. Choose an input method:
    • Select cases from a list: Pick from your RiskOS™ account by ID or date range.
    • Input IDs manually: Enter up to 100 IDs (comma-separated).
    • Use custom JSON input: Paste a JSON payload into the input field.
  4. Click Run Test to begin.

2. Interpret the results

When testing with multiple IDs or historical cases, a Test Results panel is shown.


Evaluations completed

Shows how many test cases were evaluated without workflow errors vs. those with issues.


Comparative outcome chart

A bar graph compares:

  • Previous Outcome → The original workflow’s decision.
  • Test Outcome → The updated workflow’s decision.

Evaluation results table

For each ID tested, the table displays:

  • The decision from the original workflow.
  • The decision from the updated workflow.

Click the > icon to drill into step-by-step execution details.


Limitations

  • Live workflows cannot be backtested — clone into a new minor version first.
  • When testing with a single custom JSON payload, the comparative results panel is not shown.
  • Test results cannot currently be exported or downloaded (JSON, CSV, etc.).
📘

Note:

Testing may use cached enrichment results. If the same evaluation ID was used in past runs, enrichment responses are reused.

  • Adding a new service or renaming a step bypasses the cache and may trigger new calls, potentially incurring additional costs.
  • A pop-up will ask you to confirm before costs are applied.
  • To avoid cached responses entirely, provide a new evaluation ID.

Best practices

  • Test iteratively: Run small sets of IDs or synthetic cases before large-scale backtests.
  • Check error cases: Review both “completed” and “completed with errors” results to spot workflow misconfigurations.
  • Validate deltas: Focus on how outcomes differ between the original and updated workflows.
  • Document limitations: Remember that test results are view-only; keep separate notes if you need a record.
  • Interpret errors carefully: RiskOS™ often completes workflows even if individual steps throw errors.
    • A red error symbol in the side panel usually means a missing or null field.
    • Many such errors are expected and not harmful (e.g., null values used in conditions).
    • Pay special attention to errors from data services and confirm they returned a valid API response.